View Full Version : eBay-Used 7-14 for $1250 buy it now

03-12-2006, 04:00 PM
Just surfing eBay & noticed the above; says its 2mths old + warranty card. Opens @ $1100. Not much feedback, but $400 less than B&H.

03-12-2006, 04:25 PM
With the higher price lenses I would be afraid to get a bad copy and then you would be stuck with a soft lens without a warranty :down:

I couldn't do it unless I knew the seller and the return policy.

Just my 0.02

03-12-2006, 11:06 PM
I'm going to try and check this lens out in person, since I'm in San Diego, and so is the seller.

03-13-2006, 02:11 PM
Someone snapped it up before I had a chance to see it.

03-13-2006, 05:14 PM
Not for everybody; bit I figured it would go quickly. I am bit of an eBayer & it seems, slowly prices are coming down + a bit more availability!

03-13-2006, 10:13 PM
Well, I won the bidding on an 11-22mm lens today, for slightly under $500. This was the lens I really wanted anyway (and my wallet greatly preferred it as well) as it will be my main lens, whereas a 7-14 would have been much more of a special purpose item for me (and at 2 and half times the price). Now, hopefully the lens is in the condition it was advertised to be, or I'll be wishing I got a new one instead (for $670 less $50 rebate).

03-14-2006, 03:28 PM
Congratulations on the 11-22! I did the same about a month ago; bought from a reputable Trader [that is the key]. I am no expert,but love the results I have been getting; although it could be a tad wider. But like you, the 7-14 would have been too specialised a lens [learnt from expierence with a 15 f/3.5] Keep your eyes out; most eqpmt. seems to be coming down & more available. Maybe, no E-1 upgrade @ PMA is the reason?

03-14-2006, 06:14 PM
My only question about the 11-22mm lens I bought was that the seller was a relative ebay newbie (only +5 feedbacks but fortunately all of them are for selling non-trivial items) and he is definitely a real photographer and his communication has been really good. He's one of the folks who changing systems for lack of a higher resolution E-1 successor.