View Full Version : IR conversion of an E-410

06-24-2008, 04:36 PM
Conversion of an Olympus E-410 to an IR-Camera

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
by Stefan Hübner<o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
After the conversion of an E-1 of mine to an IR-Camera ( suppoorted by this very fine documentation :
http://forum.fourthirdsphoto.com/showthread.php?t=29059 by Jens Birch), the idea suggested itself,<o></o>
trying the same with an E-system-Camera with ‘liveview’ ..The idea was that the AF<o></o>
was no longer responsible and the sensor assumes the problem of the sharpness<o></o>
(but don’t run away with this idea … for it is not a compact-camera ... and there is
still a problem - I've solved for myself) .<o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
The most important reason is, you can see the picture in the infrared colours <o></o>
before taking the picture.<o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
Caution !!! :<o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
By trying this conversion, the warranty of the producer expires .Therefore certain steps <o></o>
of this thread aren’t discribed .I don’t take any liability for the accuracy,completeness <o></o>
and the consequences of trying the following conversion .You will try it on your own risk !!!!<o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
First I had to unscrew the rear panel( Abb.), all about 9.


In this process 2 screws are hidden under the protection of the view finder. ( only the upper 2 are important ).


By lifting of the rear panel you have to be careful cause of a trace pitch inside , which connects the
display and the interior of the cam . This must not be unfixed – you simply can flip the rear panel up .
(For better sight I’ve removed it )


For the next step 4 screws have to be removed : 3 to fix the sensor , one (a) to hold the <o></o>
board - left aside the sensor .<o></o>
I only raised the board und pulled out the complete sensor … but<o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
CAUTION :<o></o>
By touching the frame of the sensor and the board it can cause an electric shock ! ! !


Now I lifted off the mount of the dust buster and then folded itself backwards . For I couldn’t get the
very damageable glas off – I had to be careful for not scratching the surface …


Next step : I’ve changed the filters ( the blue one is the combined Anti Alias with the IR-blocking filter –
the red one is an Schottglas IR 695 nm ) .That's the biggest problem !!! Replacing the metallic retaining
frame is a very difficult process. To get it back at its place was harder than all !<o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
And now it’s time to get all together now …<o></o>
For nothing has to remain !<o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>
With best regards,<o></o>
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o></o>




06-24-2008, 04:47 PM
WOW! This is great stuff! Now I just need to look for a cheap E-410...

06-24-2008, 04:56 PM
Thank you for taking the time to share.

Kaiser Soze
06-24-2008, 09:52 PM
How much would you charge for this?

06-24-2008, 10:28 PM
its almost as much fun looking at the inside of the camera
thanks for taking the time...

06-24-2008, 11:39 PM
Very nice, this will definitely get moved to the keepers section at some point. Thanks!

06-25-2008, 12:50 AM

Thanks for the tutorial. Where did you get the IR pass filter? Did you have to cut it yourself? Can a 720nm filter be used instead of the 695nm? How thick does the filter need to be? How much does the filter cost? I have an E-410 that I would like to convert, and wouldn't mind trying the conversion myself. Would like to have the filter in hand before taking apart the camera. Any info is appreciated.

06-25-2008, 01:12 AM
on the same level, Im thinking AA less, where there has also been interest developing in this elsewhere.

Given (depending on your shooting regime) moire is likely to be present in <5% of your images, yet the AA filter dampens resolution 100% of the time, it just might not be as unreasonable as all that...