Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Leica Vario Elmarit 14-50 f2.8-3.5

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    2,348
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)

    Default Leica Vario Elmarit 14-50 f2.8-3.5

    official press release here
    Full spec's sheet here
    DPreview here
    This lens is very very well constructed.
    It is larger in diameter than the 14-54 Olympus lens.
    I believe it is just a tad sharper, possibly due to the Mega OIS.

    It has a manually adjusted Aperature Ring, that when attached to an Olympus camera will not function. To adjust aperature on Olympus cameras the Control Wheel is used instead of the external ring.

    The lens operates extremely smooth when using Zoom or Autofocus.

    The lens fit and finish are superb.

    Cameralabs Review
    Added: On the Leica Digilux this lens is big and bright in the viewfinder.
    Attachment 4179
    Last edited by laingjd; 05-29-2008 at 11:30 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In Beautiful So-Cal
    Posts
    6,791
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Feedback Score
    20 (100%)

    Default Re: Leica Vario Elmarit 14-50 f2.8-3.5

    I have had this lens for the last few weeks. It overall, has be a pleasure to shot with. The lens is sharp, enough for me, its close to the sharpness of the 14-54mm. The release price of this lens alone, is around $1,000, so its about 2x the price of the Zuiko 14-54mm. Really though for OIS alone it would be hard to purchase this lens. However, when using it on the L1. I must say that I am very happy. It is a great combo. It reminds me of my film days. Having a aperture ring built into the lens is very nice. I prefer this over spinning the knob on the camera.
    The lens is built very well, the same quality as the zuiko lens. What I would expect from Leica. It is slightly bigger in diameter than the zuiko 14-54mm (72mm vs 67mm). It doesn't use focus by wire, which I also prefer. However for looks and feel $500 is a hard price to pay.
    I spent a couple days shooting test targets and comparing the readouts with imatest.
    Sharpness at 14mm:
    Attachment 4413
    Sharpness at 50mm:
    Attachment 4415
    Chromatic Abberations 14mm:
    Attachment 4412
    Chromatic Abberations 50mm:
    Attachment 4414

    Raw image data here:
    Attachment 4416
    From light bleed I am guessing that CA is a bit higher than normal. But I am not going to reshoot 2 days work.
    The biggest thing is to compare each shot between the 2 lenses was done at the same time, under identical situations.

    Positives:
    The 14-50mm is about the same sharpness as the 14-54mm
    The 14-50mm has OIS. (It improves my low light shots about 35%)
    The 14-50 is a pleasure to use. (Subjective)


    Negatives:
    No claim to water resistance.
    Expensive.

    If Olympus could use the aperture ring, I would highly recommend this lens, however, that does not appear to be in the future.

    Also I am always spinning the zoom the wrong direction (It rotates in the opposite direction as the Zuiko lenses).

    The bokeh of the Leica 14-50 seems to be slightly better than that of the Zuiko 14-54mm.
    (Some examples to come later)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In Beautiful So-Cal
    Posts
    6,791
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Feedback Score
    20 (100%)

    Default Re: Leica Vario Elmarit 14-50 f2.8-3.5

    Here are a couple pictures to show where in my opinion that the Leica out performs the Zuiko lens.
    On Easter morning I took out Cody to get his easter eggs. In the morning the neighbor placed 3 in the front yard before church. For that shot I used the Zuiko 14-5mm. In the afternoon (where Cody is in his Easter outfit) I used the Leica 14-50mm. Both shots are similar distance from the background, and both are shot wide open.

    Zuiko14-54mm
    1/200
    f3.1
    focal 27mm

    1/160
    f3.5
    focal 50mm

    (Click on either picture to see the Easter gallery)
    Really I prefer the Leica lens over the Zuiko because of the bokeh but I don't think that its worth $500 more than the Zuiko.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    1,180
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)

    Default Re: Leica Vario Elmarit 14-50 f2.8-3.5

    pros: quick focus, effective image stabilization, sharp, contrasty images through entire range, fast, beautiful bokeh, very little light falloff - this lens has me dropping out of the megapixel race! Stunning portraits and landscape photos.

    cons: Aperture ring and auto-focus wasted on any newer Olympus camera body.

    paid: not enough haha
    Last edited by srf4real; 05-08-2008 at 07:49 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Digital Lenses Leica Vario Elmarit 14-150 3.5-5.6
    By tspore in forum Member Reviews
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-27-2008, 02:38 PM
  2. SOLD FS: Leica D Vario-Elmarit 14-50mm
    By 3dpan in forum Buy / Sell Archive
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-27-2008, 05:15 AM
  3. FS: Leica Vario-Elmarit 14-50 lens
    By vciinc in forum Buy / Sell Archive
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-14-2007, 07:35 AM
  4. FS: Leica Vario-Elmarit 14-50/2.8-3.5 ASPH OIS
    By Godfrey in forum Buy / Sell Archive
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-25-2007, 09:13 AM
  5. FS - Panasonic DMC-L1 with Leica Vario-Elmarit lens - $1150
    By rrobinson54 in forum Buy / Sell Archive
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-04-2007, 02:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •