Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Interesting article

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Barbados
    Posts
    1,354
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
    Feedback Score
    0

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Latvia
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks
    194
    Thanked 191 Times in 143 Posts
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default Re: Interesting article

    If you're doing landscapes, the only advantage a bigger sensor/camera will get you is resolution. And nobody really cares a whole lot about resolution anymore because the platforms we view pictures on are actually really small these days.

    If you're doing travel, m4/3 cannot be beat.

    But if you need shallow depth of field at wider focal lengths, such as full frame 35mm equiv., which you would for most wedding work for example, m4/3 is not for you. If you look at pictures taken with a FF and a 35mm f/1.4 or 50mm f/1.4 or 24mm f/1.4, you simply cannot get that look with m4/3. The question is, do you want to? Do you need to? Are you willing to spend thousands of dollars more for your equipment?
    Olympus OM-D EM-5
    12mm f/2.0 - 17mm f/1.8 - 25mm f/1.4 - 60mm f/2.8 macro - 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7
    - FL36R

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •